clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Field Gulls Mailbag: Who will be the Seahawks’ most improved players in 2024?

Answering your questions concerning the Seahawks roster!

Seattle Seahawks v Tennessee Titans Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images

We’re in the quietest part of the NFL offseason. The draft is done, the schedule is out, and there are a few OTAs and mandatory minicamp to get through before the summer break into training camp. Seattle Seahawks preseason gets underway in less than three months!

Questions were submitted in this week’s Field Gulls mailbag, and I’ve selected the most interesting ones to answer! Thanks to everyone who submitted.


Donut receipt - QB3

donut receipt
Is there anywhere I can see some ink spilled over the Seahawks QB3 competition?
And does our green OC make such an ink spill a Rorschach test that we all need to take?

Yeah I think you need a third quarterback on the team to have a QB3 competition. Most likely, Seattle will sign some veteran name or a fringe talent to take QB3 snaps in preseason, cut that player, and we’re back to just Geno and Howell on the 53-man roster. The emergency QB rule getting tweaked pretty much justifies only keeping two QBs.

Ahenobarbus - The UDFA gems

Ahenobarbus
Who will be this year's UDFA preseason fan crush, and will he make the 53 on Week 1?

On offense it’s either Washington tight end Jack Westover or Boise State running back George Holani. It seems there’s always a UDFA running back (regardless of team) who becomes a preseason darling. Defensively I go with Nelson Ceaser, the versatile edge rusher from Houston. I’ll have something on him when I’m back from my trip, but I can see Ceaser pushing Darrell Taylor for a roster spot. It’s actually a mild surprise he wasn’t even drafted looking at his highlights and body of work.

I believe Holani has the best shot to make the roster just because teams generally will roster four running backs, followed by Westover as a possible TE/FB/H-back option, and then Ceaser as least likely. Maybe I’m bullish on this UDFA class but I believe the Seahawks will have multiple UDFA rookies on the Week 1 roster.


Ron LaCroix - Laken Tomlinson and Mike Morris

Ron LaCroix
Looking at Laken's PFF blocking grades.....is he really gonna be that effective at LG? I think he's washed up...

I don’t expect him to be very good, but blocking for New York Jets quarterbacks must be a miserable experience. It’s distinctly possible he’s washed up, but for “Haha, Jets!” content purposes, I’d appreciate him finding the fountain of youth.

Ron LaCroix
and as a follow up to my question, I see Murphy in the 4 front 'pass downs' as a DT. Obviously Leonard Williams will be the other DT in that front. My question is where will Mike Morris try to find playing time in this DL?

The plan was to make him a 3-tech under Pete Carroll and Clint Hurtt. I don’t think Macdonald will have a change of plans for Morris, and I don’t see him being a big edge rusher. He’s probably going to be a rotational player and not a major part of the defense, but rotational players matter! I hope he’s recovering well from surgery and shines in preseason.


JMiles1978: Opposing fans at Lumen Field

Jmiles1978
Why do we overrate fans taking over Lumen? In the 49ers and Steelers games last season, while there were pockets of red and gold, it was pretty clear and obvious on tv the 12s were at least 60% of the audience. A weird new trend to whine about…

“At least 60% of the audience” in your own building is not a good thing. The Steelers have a ridiculously loyal and well-traveled fanbase, but that particular game was gross for how loud the stadium sounded for every major Pittsburgh play. I’m not going to single out fans or any of that, but when you take out the empty stadium 2020 COVID-19 season, the Seahawks are barely above .500 at home since 2017. What I have noticed is a substantial increase in away fans at Lumen whenever a reputable team and/or big opposing fanbase is in town.


SeeMoewe91 - Most improved player candidates

SeeMoewe91
Who are your candidates for most improved player (Offense/Defense)?

Offense: Jaxon Smith-Njigba. When I argue for JSN as “most improved” that means his route tree expands, his role in the offense increases, his drops decrease (he had quite a few bad ones last year, but he was a rookie who just had wrist surgery), and his productivity surges to that of a borderline number one receiver. This is partly down to my belief in Ryan Grubb as an offensive coordinator and in JSN for his outstanding talents as a football player. With Tyler Lockett on the other side of 30, I’m looking for JSN to emerge as a star sooner rather than later.

Defense: Derick Hall. This is sort of by default because if Riq Woolen improves from Year 2 then that means he’s closer to his rookie performance, which feels less of an improvement and more of returning to his best form (or exceeding it). Hall was underwhelming as a pass rusher (0 sacks and low pressure rate), showed some promise against the run in a limited role, but ideally he has that similar second season leap as Boye Mafe.


Clamdragon - Seattle’s offensive line

clamdragon
Prior to the draft, OL was widely seen as one of, if not the, weakest positions group(s). What are your predictions projections for week 1 starting OL vs week 18 starting OL, and how do you feel about those lineups?

Week 1: Charles Cross-Christian Haynes-Olu Oluwatimi-Anthony Bradford-Abraham Lucas.

Week 18: Stone Forsythe-Christian Haynes-Nick Harris-Sautoa Laumea-Michael Jerrell

The Seahawks will be resting starters after securing home field advantage throughout the playoffs. Therefore, I’m not worried about Week 18.

I’m grimacing a bit at how inexperienced my legitimately serious Week 1 OL looks. This might be a “growing pains” season for the entire interior. It’s an offensive line with promise, which is something we haven’t said much about past Seahawks units.


OLYROB - Extra meeting guys, coaching staff inexperience

OLYROB
Devon Witherspoon is (as Dave Wyman puts it) "an extra meeting guy"; meaning that opposing teams have to have an extra meeting to go over how to deal with that one player. I think that he's our only one. If we were to develop one more on defense and one on offense, in 2024, who are the most likely candidates?

JSN on offense and Byron Murphy on defense. Didn’t have to give this much thought. An elite wide receiver (or tight end) is basically a must in today’s NFL. Murphy being a potential game-wrecker on the defensive interior would be so crucial for a Seahawks team lacking in that department.

OLYROB
We have a first time NFL head coach.
We have several coaches in key positions that have never held any NFL coaching jobs.
Historically those two things have not been (deemed) successful in the NFL about half the time.
Where and how will this bite us in the ass? I'm sure it will happen at least once.
(And to all the Nervous Pervouses out there I'm not down on the hire(s) or advocating for Pete; just looking at history- and looking forward to all the replies of examples when it was successful.)

I’d be lying if I wasn’t experiencing some trepidation with having assistant coaches with no NFL experience on the offensive line and at offensive coordinator. Then you get to Mike Macdonald’s first time as an NFL head coach and it’ll be a learning process for everyone. It’s partially why I believe Leslie Frazier was hired. Re Grubb: I cannot recall any NFL offensive coordinators who assumed playcalling duties without ever having prior experience in the league.

The best case scenario is they’re fresh, innovative faces in a sport that loves retreads and recycling the same names. Worst case scenario is everyone from Grubb to Huff to the other non-NFL experienced assistants are quite literally out of their league and it shows. Some great unknowns but it’s probably more welcome then potentially going down Retread Road.


cold steel and sunshine
Let's go over Grubb's scheme and how his O line works as well as what we can expect to see from backs and receivers/TE as far as routes and motions.
I think Fant is going to go off in this system. I'm curious based scheme what you see happening

While I expect Grubb to carry over a lot of his college concepts to the NFL, the two levels of the sport are still too fundamentally different to do a direct C&P. It’s functionally impossible since the hashmarks are aligned wider in college than in the NFL.

If you heard Geno Smith at OTAs earlier this week, he made reference to Grubb planning to have less pre-snap shifts and motion in the pros than he had at Washington.

Geno also referenced being a dropback passer and how Grubb’s offense suits him. Keep in mind that it’s May and the new systems are being installed.

Is this a sign of less play-action than desired? Griff Sturgeon (Cmikesspinmove) has helped sift through the numbers of Grubb’s early down play-action rate compared to the Seahawks during that span.

Then there’s the run blocking scheme. He relied predominantly on zone at Fresno State and in his first season at Washington, then it shifted toward a greater mix of gap vs. zone.

My guess is we see mostly zone with the Seahawks. The projected starters are all comfortable in zone, so that shouldn’t be a major thing. Fant “going off” in this system is really dependent on how they distribute the targets. Maybe what you mean is he’s a lower volume, high-efficiency and YAC target who moves the chains and rips off chunk plays. Something like 55 catches for 800 yards and 5 touchdowns sounds good to me. Getting Fant in space is the best way for him to operate, and I believe that’s going to be Grubb’s goal in this offense.

Lastly, I anticipate the Seahawks being an above-average screen team both in attempts and efficiency. The JSN screens aren’t going away (nor should they), but we may see different wrinkles than what we saw with Shane Waldron.


That’s it for this edition of the mailbag! We’ll circle back around after mandatory minicamp.